From reading to action
A practical path through this guide.
Select a step to explore what to do and why it matters.
Set the timing requirement
Agree how quickly the destination must reflect a source change.
Webhooks notify your system when a provider emits an event; polling asks the provider for changes on a schedule. Neither approach eliminates reconciliation. Choose based on delivery behavior, acceptable delay, rate limits, and the source system's capabilities.
Understand the business timing
A daily reporting workflow may work well with scheduled polling. A user expecting an account update shortly after payment may need webhook-driven processing. Define an acceptable processing window before deciding that every integration must be real time.
Estimate polling volume. Checking an endpoint every minute means 1,440 checks per day even when nothing changes. That is an arithmetic estimate, not a vendor billing prediction; pagination and account count can multiply the actual requests.
Design webhook intake carefully
Verify authenticity using the provider's documented method. Validate the event, persist accepted work durably, and return a timely response. Move slow processing into a worker when the architecture supports it. An acknowledgement should mean you have accepted responsibility for the event, not merely printed it to a log.
Expect duplicates and potentially out-of-order delivery. Use stable identifiers and state rules that prevent an older event from overwriting newer information. A webhook is a notification to act or inspect state, not proof that its embedded snapshot is the latest version.
Make polling incremental
Store a durable cursor or checkpoint. Use stable pagination and an overlap window where necessary to avoid losing records updated at a boundary. Deduplicate records encountered twice. Only advance the checkpoint after the page's work is safely recorded.
For a source that supports only timestamps, consider records sharing the same update time and late-arriving changes. Document the limits of the strategy. A nightly full reconciliation may catch gaps that a short rolling window cannot.
Use both when reliability needs it
A practical pattern is webhooks for fast updates plus periodic reconciliation for missing outcomes. Keep both paths behind the same validation and deduplication logic so reconciliation does not create a second source of duplicates.
Test a disabled webhook endpoint, a repeated event, an empty polling page, and an interrupted pagination run. The system should catch up predictably and make delayed records visible. Select the simpler approach when its delivery delay meets the actual business requirement.
Further reading
Stripe's webhook guide describes its event delivery behavior. See pagination and checkpoints for a safe scheduled synchronization pattern.
A few practical answers
Frequently asked questions
When is polling a reasonable alternative to webhooks?
Polling can suit work with a tolerable processing delay, such as periodic reporting. Use incremental checkpoints, stable pagination and deduplication rather than repeatedly scanning everything.
Can webhooks and polling run together safely?
Yes, when both paths share validation and deduplication. Webhooks can provide prompt updates while periodic reconciliation looks for missed business outcomes.


